Sunday, October 2, 2011

Country Capacity and Accomplishments and Application of the Policy Options Framework(cont...)

Sri Lanka

Key Policy Options and Strategic Actions

Assess

* Develop a NCD surveillance system. A national ongoing NCD surveillance system is required for strategic planning. It should include behavioral risk factors, NCD morbidity, mortality, health
services utilization, and special population-based registries for cancer and injury.

Plan

* Finalize nation NCD policies. Sri Lanka has made good progress in developing key NCD policies, which are near adoption by government. A push to finalize these policies and to resource them, as well as to engage stakeholders in implementation, is needed.

Develop and Implement

* Create an intensified national NCD program. Currently, the responsibility for NCDs is divided
among at least three directorates. In order to get the best from this arrangement, an intensified
national NCD program with sufficient resources and authority to make it effective is needed to
develop, coordinate, and implement national prevention and control policies.

* Increase use of lower-level facilities to treat NCDs. Inefficiencies in health services delivery are occurring with the overuse of higher-level facilities. Lower facilities for NCD care need to be
utilized where appropriate. In addition, integration of preventive and curative services at the
primary care level to manage NCDs would improve efficiency. Currently, the capacity for
diagnosis and treatment within primary care is limited. Human resource development upgrading
facilities will be needed.

* Develop financing strategies to assure access and protect the poor. A substantial proportion of
health services is currently financed with private resources, mostly out of pocket—and this
proportion is increasing. Financing strategies for health services to assure access to diagnostics
and to simple, inexpensive, and effective medications is badly needed. In addition, these policies
need to be sensitive to the poor who may currently be forgoing basic treatment since they
cannot pay for it.

* Develop public–private partnerships. The public sector now provides a significant proportion of health services. However, the private sector remains poorly understood. Public–private
partnerships that link the two systems would allow for better coordination and efficiencies.

Evaluate

* Develop monitoring and evaluation capacity. Evaluation of the process and outcome of health
services is currently a critical issue and will only become more important as the burden of NCDs
and services use increase. Thus, health information systems need to be refined. In addition, as
national policies are implemented, evaluation will need to assess progress and to direct
resources to where they will have the largest impact. While some of the surveillance effort (see
Assess above) will assist with this task, more detailed evaluation will be required for some
aspects of policy evaluation.

No comments: